|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
2.1. What are the different estimates?
29% of the globe surface is land. Out
of this, the FAO estimated in 2000 that 38.7 million km² (26%)
were ‘forested land’. However the estimate of the WRI
for 1997 is lower at 33.36 million km² while the WCMC gives
a higher estimate for 1996 at 39.88 million km². More...
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
2.2. Are the FAO figures reliable?
The FAO figures tend to be the reference for studies
on the status of forests globally but they are challenged for several
reasons:
- The rate of loss of tropical and other forests has been criticized
because it includes plantation forests in the definition of forest
in developing countries.
- Successive reports have used different definitions of forest,
making comparisons difficult. More…
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
2.3. Why are there different estimates of forested land?
- There are difficulties with measuring forestland, especially in
remote places. Developing countries often do not have the budget
or trained staff to conduct or update their forest inventory.
More...
- Basic surveying techniques are being replaced by aerial photography
and satellite imagery. These allow measurement of inaccessible
forests but the interpretation of the data can be problematic.
When the FAO switched to satellite measurement, its global forest
cover figures jumped from 34,424 km² in 1990 to 39,522 million
km2 in 2000. More...
- Changes in land uses are constant, so land which was deforested
at one time can become forest land again some ten years later.
More...
|
| |
|
|
| |
|